Confidence before the change reaches production.
Antifailure gives developers a place to test the change they are about to ship, with realistic data, running services, and evidence they can inspect.
Make production conditions part of the review.
Antifailure builds a disposable copy of your production stack for every pull request. It branches a masked, referentially consistent Postgres from a verified golden, builds your services and then runs them inside a sandbox that cannot reach the internet except where you say it can, drives real workflows with agents that use the accessibility tree the way a person does, and rehearses pending migrations for exclusive locks, table rewrites and query plan regressions before any of it reaches production.
A pull request can pass its tests and still behave differently on a large database or across several running services. Antifailure brings those conditions into the review, while there is still time to change the code.
The implementation, plans, and known limits are public in the source repository. Installation and operating details live in the documentation.
Build. Test. Review. Clean up.
Build a disposable twin
The change gets a temporary copy of the application stack instead of sharing a long-lived staging environment.
Prepare verified state
Postgres data is masked inside the customer boundary, scanned, and attested before an environment can use it.
Contain and exercise
Egress policy controls external effects while deterministic workflows and exploratory agents use the running application.
Report and remove
The run returns evidence and a verdict, then cleanup removes the resources it created and records the outcome.
Inspectable where trust matters.
The repository is MIT licensed except for the separately licensed ee/ directory. The community build excludes that directory rather than hiding it behind a runtime switch. The customer-side engine, masking, containment, and cleanup paths remain inspectable where they handle sensitive state.
See the open-core license boundary and the control-plane architecture.
Understand what each result covers.
Review each result alongside the checks that ran and the environment they used. The report identifies missing coverage so your team can decide what to test next.
Read the terms and stated limits or the release-security model.
Bring your next pull request.
See how Antifailure would test your stack, what it would check, and the evidence your team would review before merging.